Trans Housing Atlanta Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 465264420
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 4707270414
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Shelters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $165,288
- Expenses
- $196,128
- Assets
- $266,904
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- Tracee McDaniel (Board Chair)
- Jamie Roberts (Chief Finanacial Officer)
- Dorrae Jackson (Program Manager)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Charitable. The mission of Trans Housing Atlanta Program, Inc. is to provide safe housing and appropriate supportive services to transgender and gender nonbinary and gender non-conforming individuals who experience homelessness to facilitate movement to independent living and employment and reduction of risky behaviors, or who seek intermediate or long-term housing that's centered on the employment and reduction of risky behaviors, or who seek intermediate or long-term housing that's centered on the Atlanta. To dismantle the binary nature of emergency housing services in metro Atlanta.
What it reported doing in 2024
The housing assistance we provided to individuals in 2024 pursuant to our Housing and Supportive Services Program included direct cash assistance for rent, utilities, security deposits, application fees, identity document application and copy fees, transportation assistance, and motel rooms and short-term rentals. We also provided food, household goods, toiletries and other personal hygiene products. We provided these forms of assistance to a total of 93 individuals. We kept the maximum amount of cash or equivalent assistance per person at a level up to $600.00 per person, though we made exceptions in certain circumstances. The total amount of cash spent in direct assistance was $37,163.00. Other administrative expenses associated with our Housing and Supportive Services Program added up to $6472.82. Also in 2024, we began sponsorship of the Sexual Liberation Collective, with a mission to to provide quality sexuality education and transformative experiences to communities, and to provide sexual liberators with support, advice, and accountability on their personal and professional projects. The goal is to create safe and accountable spaces for people to learn about and explore their own sexualities, desires, and healing journeys. The Collective intentionally prioritizes people of color, trans* and gender non-conforming folks, people of working class backgrounds, sex workers, women, and all body shapes, sizes, and abilities. The Collective provides trauma-informed education and support in forums like the Sex Down South Conference in Atlanta and other venues nationwide. Total expenses for the Sexual Liberation Collective was $26,064.54
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 19
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 19.7%; rating input score 20
- Program expense ratio: 16.6%; rating input score 17
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.36; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 36.3%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 37% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 19.7% of revenue deployed · 16.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.