Training for Safety Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 331010920
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- San Ramon, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6506920437
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Safety Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,319
- Expenses
- $83,595
- Assets
- $35,215
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Barry Lewis (President)
- Rev Hailey McKeefry-Delmas (President)
People named in this filing
- Dan Bellack (Director)
- Carole deGery (Director)
- Judy Girardi-Chapman (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Dedicated to providing the highest level of safety-related training for government employees, security professionals and the general public. We accomplish this goal by combining execeptionally qualified staff with motivated and experienced instructors, using the latest adult-based learning techniques, to produce an educational product which is always accurate, up-to-date and informative. In addition we offer select consulting services and products which complement our training and add to the overall safety of our clintele.
What it reported doing in 2017
The organization trained 627 students across four different courses in 2016.the organization offered the following courses in 2015: one day advanced dispatcher update two day advanced dispatcher update three day advanced dispathcer update one day mental illness awareness one day post traumatic stress & traumatic brain injury three day stress management in keeping with the organization's not for profit goals, we trained 229students at no charge to their respective agencies. This resulted in savings of $45,232 to their agencies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.9%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.42; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -19.8% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -22.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -8.8% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $84K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.