Tracy Bulldog Band Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 463916663
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2017–2022
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2014
Location: Tracy, CA, USA
Phone: 2099143914
Rating: 51
Verdict: MIXED
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue: $28,410
Expenses: $11,868
Assets: $35,175

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

GENE MALOGAN (President)
DINAH JARATA (Vice President)

People named in this filing

GENE MALOGAN (President)
DINAH JARATA (Vice President)
KELLIE MALOGAN (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide secondary financial support of the tracy high school band programs. To boost and encourage the philosophy of music education and to aid and support the band activities and provide assistance to the band director and students when needed.

What it reported doing in 2022

Band reviews - competition fees, trailer rentals, food, uniform cleaning/repairing, costumes, transportation

Operating model

Revenue model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 28
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 72
Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 18.5%; rating input score 18
Program expense ratio: 44.3%; rating input score 44

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: 58.2%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.96; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: -39.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: -27.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 18.5% of revenue deployed · 44.3% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments · $5K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
Schedules: 3 filed schedules
Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2022
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 44/100.
High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.