Tov Lehodos Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464244484
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Spring Valley, NY, USA
Phone
8455402828
Rating
49
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Judaism
Affiliation
Judaism

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,504
Expenses
$37,081
Assets
$278
Liabilities
$276,953

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SAMUEL LURIA (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SAMUEL LURIA (PRESIDENT)
  • NACHMEN HUSS (VICE PRESIDE)
  • CHAIM ZILBER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide spiritual and financial assistance to troubled jewish teenagers and young adults to strengthen their religious and moral welfare; to provide transportation for the jewish elderly and sick as needed; to provide financial aid and support to jewish charities to help further their works; to provide short-term financial assistance in order to address large and unexpected expenses; to buy, renovate, repair, improve, maintain, and sell real property to be used as affordable and reasonably priced housing for individuals and families in financial need of same; and to aid, assist, cooperate, co-sponsor and otherwise engage in concerted action with private and governmental agencies, organizations and institutions in the united states and abroad on religious programs, to advance and promote the spiritual and physical welfare of the jewish people.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 23
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 23.3%; rating input score 23
  • Program expense ratio: 22.9%; rating input score 23

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 996.23; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 23.3% of revenue deployed · 22.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.