Tourist Center Senior Citizens Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411464206
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Hibbing, MN, USA
Phone
2182624166
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$130,040
Expenses
$122,066
Assets
$18,840
Liabilities
$7,042

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mike Jugovich (President)
  • Peggy Mehle (Vice President)
  • Melissa Versich (Executive Director(Jan - March 2024))
  • Tammy Estes (Executive Director (April - November 2024))

People named in this filing

  • Mike Jugovich (President)
  • Peggy Mehle (Vice President)
  • Beth Pierce (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide opportunities for seniors to socially and actively engage with one another as well as with the community through senior activities and assistance with visiting tourists.

What it reported doing in 2024

Senior activity programs including: Get in Shape, Cooking Around theWorld, Defensive Driving Classes, Health and Technology labsand other resources for socialization with other seniors and the community as a whole.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.2%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 71.6%; rating input score 72

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 36.2%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 69.1% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -103.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.2% of revenue deployed · 71.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $87K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.