Touchstone Youth Rescue Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
621316818
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Nashville, TN, USA
Phone
6156681374
Rating
48
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protestant
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$174,587
Expenses
$137,814
Assets
$119,185

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Melony Pugh-Weber (Executive Director)
  • Jim Weber (Associate Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Melony Pugh-Weber (Executive Director)
  • Jim Weber (Associate Executive Director)
  • Suzanne Frensley (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Spread & Encourage Growth in the Gospel of Jesus Christ

What it reported doing in 2025

(cont) with the purpose of evangelism, encouragement &challenge to youth for further committment. 111 students were counseled through participation in character, values and leadership training program at overton high school 39 students were taught and counseled through participation in character, values and leadership training program at hillsboro high school. 50 students were taught and counseled through participation in character, values and leadership training at lawson high school. 35 students were taught and counseled through participation in character, values and leadership training program at nashville school of the arts 34 students were taught and counseled through participation in character, values and leadership training program at oliver middle school. (269 total students)

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 1
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.3%; rating input score 1
  • Program expense ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 2

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.1%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 68.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.3% of revenue deployed · 1.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.