TotalCare Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922455495
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Fort Worth, TX, USA
Phone
8173463313
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Health Support Services
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,789,524
Expenses
$809,818
Assets
$1,048,390
Liabilities
$11,298

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WALID SAADE (PRESIDENT)
  • FOUAD SAADE (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • AMANDA BEATTIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • AMANDA BEATTIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $157,300 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Transforming lives, one person at a time.

What it reported doing in 2025

Totalcare foundation works with morning star love project in uganda to help facilitate and sponsor surgery needed for children with congenital heart defects. The program works with the uganda heart institute to assess children in need of surgery that is unavailable in uganda. Once a patient is identified, the morning star love project works with a social worker to determine the level of financial assistance needed, and the family's ability to comply with the treatment plan before and after surgery. After assessing the level of need and sponsorship, the morning star love project helps coordinate the surgery and all associated expenses, including transportation and housing for the child and mother during their recovery period. The children are taken to a hospital in india or kenya, depending on the required (see schedule o) surgery and the facility's capacity. In 2025, totalcare foundation working with the morning star love project, sponsored and facilitated surgeries for 5 children in uganda.

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 57% for direct work, and 43% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 33
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 17.5%; rating input score 17
  • Program expense ratio: 38.6%; rating input score 39
  • Fundraising efficiency: $424.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 54.7%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.29; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.4%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 54.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 94.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 119.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 5 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 17.5% of revenue deployed · 38.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $313K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $157K · 4 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 39/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.