Torrington Police Athletic League

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222488219
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Torrington, CT, USA
Phone
8604892000
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Centers, Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$162,522
Expenses
$125,880
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANTHONY PIETRAFESA (President)
  • LINDSAY RAYMOND (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • ANTHONY PIETRAFESA (President)
  • LINDSAY RAYMOND (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The torrington police activities(ne athletic) league, inc.(p.a.l.) is a charitable 501c3, whose mission is to make a difference in the lives of over 850 local children ages 5-18 in the northwest corner of Connecticut through programs under the guidance of law enforcement, business leaders, educators and community volunteers to keep kids in school and to deter violence. We offer a number of recreational programs and sports clinics, most notably our intramural and travel basketball programs. We provide mentoring through our p.a.l. Scholar program and we offer educational programs on important social topics including bullying, internet safety, training on when to call an officer and how to respond when an officer is called. We also host special community events to help build strong relationships between officers and our community and we collaborate with other organizations on summer camps. Our website offers more information on our most up to date activities: www.torringtonpal.com. Our we

What it reported doing in 2014

Providing support for local youth sports; especially the police athletic league boys and girls basketball programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 24
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 22.1%; rating input score 22
  • Program expense ratio: 28.5%; rating input score 28

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.5%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 22.8%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 22.1% of revenue deployed · 28.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $36K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.