Torrance Chorale Friends

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
953808603
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Torrance, CA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Performing Arts Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,734
Expenses
$1,119
Assets
$23,270

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUSAN CULVER-SUHR (President)

People named in this filing

  • SUSAN CULVER-SUHR (President)
  • KAREN PETERSON (Secretary)
  • KAREN PETERSON (CFO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The torrance civic chorale, as part of the city of torrance department of recreation, has been in existence for over 20 years. Since 1979, the members of this chorale have been organized to raise funds for needs which the city does not meet. In 1986, the chorale was informed by the city that it could no longer raise funds to keep bank accounts; so this organization, the torrance chorale friends, was formed to meet the chorale's continuing needs. By definition, any member of the torrance civic chorale, a group singing class under the umbrella of the city of torrance department of recreation, is a member of the torrance chorale friends. Each member holds equal status and is entitled to one vote in any election. The board of directors is elected from this membership.

What it reported doing in 2024

To support the torrance chorale

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 80.5%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.8; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -29.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.