Tomorrow Clubs International
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813501048
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Eagan, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6124196128
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,691,549
- Expenses
- $1,557,327
- Assets
- $2,641,166
- Liabilities
- $11,444
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARK BROYLES (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- PAUL MARTY (EXECUTIVE DI): $76,236 total reported compensation
- CYNTHIA MARTY (DIRECTOR): $20,436 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We exist to fulfill the great commission by helping children learn to follow jesus.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization partners with local churches to provide long-term discipleship for children and teenagers in underserved communities through a network of weekly bible clubs. Each club is run by volunteers from a local church as an outreach to the community with the goal of connecting children and their families to the local congregation. Attendees memorize scripture and learn biblical principles as they work through the tomorrow clubs curriculum. Enduring relationships are formed as leaders teach valuable life skills in hobby classes. Many of the more than 4,000 volunteer tomorrow club leaders are former club members who are now investing in the next generation. Supported by charitable contributions and sponsorship of mission trips, the organization serves more than 49,000 children and teens, mostly from unchurched families. About 1,700 clubs meet weekly, often in remote villages where there is little if any opportunity to hear the gospel. The organization works in twelve countries - albania, armenia, belarus, Georgia, kazakhstan, moldova, romania, russia, serbia, ukraine, zimbabwe, and south africa.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 80% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 80
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.6%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 72.1%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $5 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Pass
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.9%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.7; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.6% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.6% of revenue deployed · 72.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $76K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.