Tomagwa Ministries Inc Dba Tomagwa Healthcare Ministries

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
760280324
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Tomball, TX, USA
Phone
2813570747
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,229,781
Expenses
$2,471,560
Assets
$2,503,673
Liabilities
$1,291,183

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TIMIKA SIMMONS (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • TIMIKA SIMMONS (CEO): $152,601 total reported compensation
  • Jarred Erdmann (COO): $81,224 total reported compensation
  • STEPHEN HUGHES (CFO): $15,019 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Tomagwa healthcare ministries exists to provide compassionate christian healthcare to community members with limited resources. It is a full-time comprehensive family practice serving low-resource uninsured residents, offering a broad range of primary healthcare services.

What it reported doing in 2024

Tomagwa healthcare ministries, established in 1989 in tomball, Texas, provides compassionate christian healthcare to community members who have limited resources. In 2023, the organization delivered 29,858 medical visits, 18,326 dental services, and filled 8,591 prescriptions, serving residents across harris, montgomery, and waller counties. Tomagwa healthcare ministries reached a major milestone in itsthree-year journey to transition to a federally qualified health center (fqhc) with the successful completion of its fqhc operational site visit by the health resources and services administration (hrsa), september 26-28, 2023.tomagwa has operated as a safety net clinic, relying on private donations to provide care to uninsured and underinsured residents. The successful passing of the fqhc look-alike operational site visit marks the next step in a process to help expand its ability to care for those most in need. Tomagwa plans to pursue full fqhc status in 2024.during the site visit, tomagwa was recognized for its commitment to compliance with local, state, and federal regulations, patient-centered care, operational excellence, and improving health outcomes for underserved populations.additionally, tomagwa's efforts were further validated by its recent recognition by the american heart association, which awarded the clinic for its outstanding care in managing diabetes, cholesterol, and hypertension. This achievement highlights tomagwa's unwavering focus on improving the health of its community through excellence in care and operational efficiency.these accomplishments are a direct result of the hard work and dedication of tomagwa's entire team, including donors, students, volunteers, healthcare professionals, administrative staff, and leadership, who all remain committed to serving the community's healthcare needs with compassion and expertise.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 62
  • Accountability: 83
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.8%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 81.9%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.52; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.8% of revenue deployed · 81.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $153K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.