Toluca Lake Beautification Partners
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 882868035
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Burbank, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8189748519
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Environmental Beautification and Aesthetics
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $163,766
- Expenses
- $320,832
- Assets
- $1,917,300
- Liabilities
- $2,500
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- RYAN ALTOON (CHAIR)
- DANA BOYD (VICE CHAIR)
- NATALIE BLOXHAM (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of toluca lake beautification partners is to support a thriving community by enhancing public spaces to promote a livable, walkable, and healthy environment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Toluca lake beautification partners (tlbp), enhances toluca lake, los angeles, through beautification, sustainability, safety, and community engagement.in 2024, tlbp transformed public areas to boost community pride through strategic landscaping and infrastructure projects: toluca lake village clock: this project created a welcoming community space along riverside drive featuring an illuminated clock, seating, paving, and landscaping. The project was funded by community partners, including chase bank and the greater toluca lake neighborhood council (gtlnc). Tlbp completed installation of the toluca lake village clock and added two benches adjacent to the clock, further enhancing the space for public use and neighborhood gathering.environmental sustainabilitytlbp promotes environmentally responsible landscapes and practices throughout the community: drought-tolerant and native plants: projects such as the village clock and riverside drive median prioritize native, drought-tolerant landscaping to reduce water usage.school garden: tlbp collaborated with lausd and other partners to create a garden at toluca lake elementary school, featuring 12 vegetable beds and seven trees and serving more than 500 students.waste reduction efforts: tlbp installed 11 new trash receptacles along public areas, enabling community members to properly sort recyclables from trash.streetscape planningtlbp enhances walkability and local economic vitality through long-term planning initiatives: riverside drive streetscape: a conceptual design for riverside drive (from sancola to clybourn) includes improved crosswalks, pedestrian lighting, and public art, informed by feedback from a 2021 community survey.lankershim boulevard: tlbp's long-standing planning efforts for lankershim boulevard, initiated in 2012, incorporate community input and have contributed to the southeast community plan update.public safety and infrastructuretlbp works to improve safety and accessibility throughout toluca lake: sidewalk repairs: improvements along riverside drive enhance pedestrian safety and accessibility.agency collaboration: tlbp collaborates with city of los angeles agencies to ensure projects meet applicable safety and infrastructure standards.community engagementtlbp fosters neighborhood pride through collaboration and outreach: events and fundraising: tlbp organizes fundraisers to support initiatives such as the village clock and participates in community events, including earth day.partnerships: tlbp partners with nbcuniversal, local businesses, and organizations such as gtlnc, leveraging grants, sponsorships, and volunteer support to advance community-driven projects.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 93.2%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -95.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.98; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 127% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 64.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $299K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 56/100.