Toledo District Nurse Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
344427949
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2018
Location
Toledo, OH, USA
Phone
5675853618
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Home Health Care

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$160,324
Expenses
$2,538
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

34 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIEL K CASSAVAR MD (PRESIDENT, EX OFFICIO)
  • RANDALL OOSTRA (PHS PRES & CEO, EX OFFICIO)

Highest reported compensation

  • RANDALL OOSTRA (PHS PRES & CEO, EX OFFICIO): $3,061,318 total reported compensation
  • KATHLEEN S HANLEY (FORMER OFFICER): $1,569,411 total reported compensation
  • DANIEL K CASSAVAR MD (PRESIDENT, EX OFFICIO): $1,525,315 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Toledo district nurse association will support promedica health system, inc. By providing access to a seamless continuum of services in the communities it serves.

What it reported doing in 2018

Toledo district nurse association offers patients skilled nursing services that are provided under the direction of a physician in the privacy and comfort of their own homes. - see schedule o.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 63.6%; rating input score 64; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 98.4%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 63,059.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -33.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 14 of 22 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · -$6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $3.1M · 34 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 451 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.