Together for Hope
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 870835491
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Jackson, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6015405679
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,282,508
- Expenses
- $1,065,734
- Assets
- $874,160
- Liabilities
- $86,379
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- K JASON COKER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- K JASON COKER (PRESIDENT): $75,960 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of together for hope is to end persistent rural poverty in the united states of america.
What it reported doing in 2024
In many ways, 2025 left a high-water mark on the banks of our reservoir.at the national level, we hosted our annual meeting in decatur, ga; health summits across the southeast; screened our documentary rising hope around the united states and abroad (new canaan, ct; st. Louis, mo; dallas, tx; winston-salem, nc; decatur, ga; san jose, ca; lewisburg, pa; cleveland, ms; phnom penh, cambodia; atlanta, ga; selma, al); held our annual staff retreat in los cruces, nm; and launched hope box as a way to highlight the products of our social enterprise network. Besides this, our president toured the country and abroad speaking and lecturing about our work (jackson, ms; tulsa, ok; clinton, ms; Washington dc; cal, colombia; shaw, ms; greenville, sc; oxford, ms; st. Louis, mo; and lumberton, nc). We were also able to produce a 14-page glossy that describes the work that we do in counties of persistent rural poverty in the united states.together for hope (tfh) galvanized the black belt region around building a house in fitzgerald, ga, and helping a family of four become homeowners. Rachel gunter shapard, our vp for the black belt, called this program "together we build and it has become our model for creating new affordable homes and homeowners across rural america. This year we plan to build 3-4 new homes with this model that provides families with a pathway out of poverty.in the delta region we connected delta circles with our partners in silicon valley, who came to helena-west helena, ar, and installed an orchard of 3d printers, trained staff how to operate it, and hosted a community-wide party to celebrate this collaboration. Now, youth and adults in the Arkansas delta will have access to the newest technologies available which equips them with a knowledge base for the future.tfh appalachia helped one voice, one of our appalachian partners, finalize a toolkit for their organization that they have been working on for years. With our assistance, they were able to create the toolkit that will empower them to replicate their work in fighting the opioid epidemic in wv.dr. Cory peacock became our regional manager of the four corners (Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, and Colorado), which helps us truly begin to scale in the west. Having someone organize our work in the four corners is a huge leap towards scaling tfh within the tribal nations, Texas, four corners (tnt4c) region.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.2%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 66.4%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.9%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.2% of revenue deployed · 66.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $707K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $76K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.