Toe 2 Toe Youth Training Center
Legal name: Toe 2 Toe Boxing Team
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 873570914
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Salem, OR, US
- Phone
- (503) 438-6352
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $120,000
- Expenses
- $20,500
- Assets
- $109,500
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Chris McQuillian (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Adam Navarro (Presidnet)
- Chris McQuillian (Vice President)
- Brad Bahler (Treasure)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To keep teens active and engaged, build self-confidence at every stage of life, promote lifelong physical fitness, and foster discipline, respect, and resilience through structured training.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Marion and Polk County Community Health Assessment (CHA) & Community Health Improvement Plan (CHIP) 2021-2025 highlight urgent behavioral and physical health concerns. Depression, loneliness, and substance use are rising, contributing to conditions like hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. We aim to be part of the solution by offering structured programs that promote mental and physical wellness through fitness. We scholarship youth, we do summer camps, we provide after school fitness programs and on-site fitness programs. We serve about 150+ youth per week.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 50% for direct work, and 50% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 91
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 16.7%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: 97.6%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 82.9%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.34; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 16.7% of revenue deployed · 97.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.