Todd Stevenson

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
874510096
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Louisville, CO, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Amateur Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$81,986
Expenses
$99,352
Assets
$8,147

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Todd Stevenson (President - Board of Directors)

People named in this filing

  • Todd Stevenson (President - Board of Directors)
  • Kevin Suhr (Treasurer - Board of Directors)
  • Patrick Larabee (Secretary - Board of Directors)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Team Colorado Cyclings purpose is: a to foster junior amateur cycling competition; and b to provide recreational facilities that will be available to the general community; c to educate youth and adults about the health and recreational benefits associated with riding a bicycle; d to lessen the burdens of government by providing a venue for community events sponsored by local government; and e do and engage in all lawful activities that further or are consistent with the preceding purposes of the Corporation.

What it reported doing in 2024

Team Colorado Cycling continued the renovation of the Boulder Valley Velodrome in Erie Colorado. The continued focus in 2024 was maintaining of the only eleven velodromes in the United States for the local community national and international cyclist. We hosted the Colorado State Track cycling championships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -21.2%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -80.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -103.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.