TMM Family Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860379677
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tucson, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 5203229557
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,916,226
- Expenses
- $2,517,725
- Assets
- $10,643,685
- Liabilities
- $3,402,737
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Christie Lee (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Christie Lee (CEO): $130,932 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
TMM's mission is to provide quality affordale housing, essential education, and stabiliity for qualifying low-income seniors, single parents, and veterans within the Greater Tucson area.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community ClosetTMM's Community Closet, offered through TMM's ReStore--a thrift store open to the public--provides access to clothing, household goods, and essential items for individuals and families in need. Through a voucher-based system, TMM partners with nonprofits, government agencies, and community organizations to distribute clothing vouchers, allowing recipients to select items at no cost. This approach promotes dignity, choice, and access to basic necessities.During the fiscal year, the Community Closet served 566 households, representing 1,034 individuals, including 658 adults and 376 children. Of those served, approximately 50.5% were experiencing homelessness, 28.1% were low-income, 12.2% were single mothers, and 9.2% were individuals with disabilities.By meeting immediate needs in a respectful and accessible way, the Community Closet supports household stability and serves as an important entry point for individuals and families working to regain footing, reinforcing TMM's commitment to preventing homelessness and supporting long-term stability.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 72.8%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -31.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.23; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 72.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $131K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.