TLC House Indiana

Legal name: Tlc-steuben

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261272394
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Angola, IN, USA
Phone
2606242274
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Violence Shelters

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$73,124
Expenses
$72,533
Assets
$245,336
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lesli Hall (President)
  • Sally Zintsmaster (Vice President)
  • Mada Waldrop (Executive Director - Retired)
  • Lesli Hall (President)
  • Sally Zintsmaster (Vice President)
  • Mada Waldrop (Executive Director - Retired)

People named in this filing

  • Cheryll MIller (Secretary)
  • Lesli Hall (President)
  • Sally Zintsmaster (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Empowering survivors of domestic violence by providing opportunities for safe shelter, self-sufficiency, and recovery.

What it reported doing in 2025

TLC's goal is to provide the client with the tools to become a successful member of the community. To accomplish this the client must attend weekly sessions of MRT (Moral Reconation Therapy) They are required to attend therapy sessions either individually or or with their children.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.8%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.38; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 109.2%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -45.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.