Titusville Area Senior Citizens Cor

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
251339303
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
Titusville, PA, USA
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$238,872
Expenses
$197,910
Assets
$523,109
Liabilities
$11,725

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WENDY WRIGHT (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • HERB BUTCHER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CHERYL SCOTT (SECRETARY)
  • WENDY WRIGHT (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • HERB BUTCHER (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the titusville area senior citizens corporation is to assure that older adults remain active, independent, healthy, and involved in the community.

What it reported doing in 2022

Center services - organized in 1968 and incorporated in 1977, the titusville area senior citizens corporation provides services to persons age 60 and older in titusville and the surrounding area. Regular hours at the center are weekdays from 8am until 4pm. Inhouse services for senior citizens include, but are not limited to; computer training, foreign language classes, fitness programs, arts and crafts, guest speakers, bus trips, and special events. In addition to those programs, the staff provides assistance with medicare, income taxes, and helping senior citizens fill out many other types of paper work. Senior citizens may volunteer to serve on the senior council which is an advisory board. Numerous fundraisers throughout the year provide a multitude of volunteer opportunities as well.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 63% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.9%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 78.3%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.1%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.64; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.9% of revenue deployed · 78.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $155K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2016 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.