Titan Athletics
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 823326429
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Santa Clara, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4084825302
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $975,392
- Expenses
- $941,361
- Assets
- $188,889
- Liabilities
- $104,420
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HANAH KIM (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MATTHEW LARGO (BOARD MEMBER/COACH): $18,800 total reported compensation
- DAVID MARTINEZ (BOARD MEMBER/BOOKKEEPER): $5,600 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Titan Volleyball program is designed to develop the athlete's minds, skills, and to create an atmosphere where all players can succeed. We strive to have a family-like environment where all of the players, teams, and coaches work together to create a competitive environment. Our goal is to mentor players to be great teammates, show good sportsmanship, and to be leaders. Our focus is to develop young athletes to be the best they can be on and off the court. We want our players to have fun playing while learning and improving.
What it reported doing in 2024
In the 2024-2025 year as a non profit, we had over 500 athletes from age 10 to 18 participate on 15 female volleyball teams and 6 male teams. Practices were held 1 - 3 times per week. Volleyball competitions varied from 13 - 22 days, depending on the level of the team. We also hosted volleyball clinics throughout the year for more than 500 participants. Volleyball teams participated in these tournaments:- winter classic - festival fiesta classic- spring fling(continued on schedule o)- president's day weekend- sierra national qualifier- far westerns national qualifier- bay view classic- wcvba bay area league- wcvba power league- ncva boys power league
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 45
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.7%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.5%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.2; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.7% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 87.7% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $856K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $19K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.