Tishomingo County Foster Rescue

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842340822
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Iuka, MS, USA
Phone
6626603366
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Reported finances

Revenue
$110,067
Expenses
$77,700
Assets
$57,113

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GAIL MILLIGAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • GAIL MILLIGAN (PRESIDENT)
  • TAMMY HILL (SECRETARY)
  • KIMBERLY GEORGE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the organization is to rescue and foster dogs and cats for the sole purpose of enabling them to have a better life medically and physically. This organziation, also, will educate people as to the importance of spay and neuter and to obtain low cost spay and neuter grants to help all dogs and cats in tishomingo county.

What it reported doing in 2025

Tishomingo county foster rescue was able to rescue and foster dogs and cats for the sole purpose of enabling them to have a better life medically and physically. We were also able to educate people as to the importance of spay and neuter proceudres to help the dogs and cats population in tishominog county, Mississippi.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.3%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 99.6%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.4%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 42.4% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 37% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 43.7% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.3% of revenue deployed · 99.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $77K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.