Tina Seamore Learning Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042620145
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Manomet, MA, USA
Phone
5082245673
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$51,000
Expenses
$23,599
Assets
$15,208
Liabilities
$4,447

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • SANDRA TANNNENBAUM STREID (PRES./TRES./DIR.)
  • KEITH STREID (CLERK/DIR.)
  • HAROLD BRONK (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization's mission is to present educational and entertaining programs which include participants and audiences of all ages, abilities, and disabilities. To achieve this objective by developing and presenting original songs, dramatic pieces, expressive choreography and training materials which inspire personal growth, artistic expression, and appreciation for participants' creative contribution to society regardless of their physical, developmental or cultural diverstities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Consultation income was derived from the offering on individual music, dance, and songwriting lessons for children and adults. The organization's informative presentations, interviews and educational displays promote our shows and programs for potential clients, and increase awareness and networking opportunities at conferences, performances, and diversity awareness events. We develop and provide original songs, choreography, lighting, sound, and staging support services for human service agencies, cultural arts, organizations, schools, and governmental agencies. In 2011, consultation services were provided for and/or with approximately 15 individuals and 25 human service agencies, cultural arts organizations, schools, government agencies, and community events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 53.7%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.