Timothy Smith Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562339680
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Roxbury, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6179683653
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,654,026
- Expenses
- $869,679
- Assets
- $1,732,248
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Carroll W Blake (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Milton Irving (Executive Dir.): $121,162 total reported compensation
- Alessandra Brown (Director): $88,945 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Timothy Smith Network empowers organizations and individuals to effectively use and have access to cutting edge technology.
What it reported doing in 2024
The Timothy Smith Network (TSN) advanced its mission to expand digital equity and economic opportunity for Boston residents by delivering a coordinated portfolio of high? impact technology education programs serving youth, adults, and veterans across the city. Through hands? on instruction, workforce? aligned training, and mentorship, TSN empowered participants to build technical proficiency, creative confidence, and pathways into emerging technology fields. Boston Design Academy (BDA) TSNs Boston Design Academy provided youth with immersive learning in digital design, engineering, and health technology, offering instruction in Unreal Engine 5, Fusion 360, 3D modeling, coding, and prototype development. Students explored real-world problem solving through modules such as Tech Your Health, where they designed wellness technologies addressing community health needs. Participants produced functional prototypes, digital games, and design concepts showcased at public presentations, strengthening their readiness for STEAM careers. Alumni Mentorship Program (AMP) The Alumni Mentorship Program supported high school and college? age youth with career exploration, professional skill? building, and paid project-based learning. AMP participants worked with industry mentors, completed digital design and technology assignments, and contributed to community? focused projects. The program emphasized accountability, communication, and portfolio development, ensuring students were prepared for internships, employment, and postsecondary opportunities. Boots 2 Technology Veterans Program TSNs Boots 2 Technology initiative provided veterans and transitioning service members with accessible pathways into technology careers. Participants received hands-on training in digital literacy, hardware and software fundamentals, cybersecurity awareness, and emerging technologies. The program supported veterans in translating military experience into civilian workforce skills, strengthening economic mobility and long-term career stability. The Builders Program Media Storytelling The Builders Program engaged youth in media production, digital storytelling, and creative technology, guiding participants through the development of short films, documentaries, podcasts, and visual narratives. Students learned camera operation, editing, sound design, and narrative structure while exploring themes rooted in community identity and lived experience. The program culminated in a public showcase celebrating youth voice, creativity, and technical achievement. Across all programs, TSN continued to bridge the digital divide, expand access to high-quality technology education, and cultivate the next generation of innovators, storytellers, and leaders from Bostons historically underserved communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 58
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.9%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 75.9%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47.4%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.99; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.9% of revenue deployed · 75.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 0 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $660K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $121K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.