Tile & Masonry Industry Labor Management

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
276184856
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Phone
7027348601
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Labor Unions

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$25,288
Assets
$14,012
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • RICHARD CRAWFORD (LABOR TRUSTEE)
  • ANTHONY IVESTER (LABOR TRUSTEE)
  • EDUARDO ZAVALA (LABOR TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The lmcc strives to develop a market in which all contractors, union and non-union, consistently meet their legal obligations to fairly compensate workers, provide proper safety conditions and compete fairly in the marketplace. To achieve its goal the lmcc actively investigates and pursues labor law violations; advocates for or against proposed legislation and regulatory rule making applicable to construction; educates employers, workers, and the general public of the value of utilizing highly skilled union labor on public and private works; and participates in programs designed to improve communication between workers, employers and union officials.

What it reported doing in 2023

To develop a market in which all contractors, union and non-union, consistently meet their legal obligations to fairly compensate workers, provide proper safety conditions and compete fairly in the marketplace.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -63.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -23.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.