Tiegerman
Legal name: Tiegerman Community Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461094626
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Glen Cove, NY, US
- Phone
- (516) 609-2000
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,591,218
- Expenses
- $7,273,725
- Assets
- $10,492,199
- Liabilities
- $3,323,479
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELLENMORIS TIEGERMAN (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ELLENMORIS TIEGERMAN (CEO): $424,791 total reported compensation
- JEREMY TIEGERMAN (COO): $416,993 total reported compensation
- CHRISTINE RADZIEWICZ (CCO): $355,639 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Giving Every Child A Voice. Unlocking the potential of every student through innovative educational programs, specialized therapies, and a commitment to communication development.
What it reported doing in 2024
At tiegerman community services (tcs), our day habilitation programs empower adults with developmental disabilities, by fostering life skills, independence, and community engagement. Each participant follows a personalized habilitation plan focused on communication, socialization, and real-world interaction. Through structured activities, individuals engage in meaningful in-house programs, volunteering, and recreational experiences aligned with their interests and potential careers.our long island day habilitation, in westbury offers classrooms, a sensory room, and activities like academics, music therapy, and daily living skills. Our queens day habilitation and program without walls (pww), in richmond hill incorporates technology, theater arts, and volunteer work. Bethpage pww, serving nassau and suffolk counties, provides full-day community immersion through social clubs, volunteering, and recreation. Tcs prioritizes individual choice, ensuring diverse programming tailored to participants' skills and interests. Door-to-door transportation is provided for all programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.3%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.3%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.44; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.1%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 6 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 76.3% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $6.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $425K · 11 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $663K reported
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.