Tian Liang Alliance
Legal name: Tianliang Alliance Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862883919
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Cuddebackville, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2016268685
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $658,435
- Expenses
- $323,411
- Assets
- $1,795,111
- Liabilities
- $32,438
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHUJIA GONG (PRESIDENT & DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SHUJIA GONG (PRESIDENT & DIRECTOR): $46,608 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support art, education and mass communication projects that can elevate society.
What it reported doing in 2024
Edited, proofread, and typeset the second, third, and fourth volumes of "xiao tan feng yun," totaling approximately 900,000 words.completed the recording of 26 episodes of the membership program "history of the qin and han dynasties."produced 302 episodes of current affairs programs on my youtube channels, along with dozens of membership programs, which have garnered 55 million views and added 60,000 subscribers on youtube.donated over $60,000 to fei tian college special scholarship program, currently supporting seven fei tian professors and lecturers pursuing higher degrees: one at harvard university for a master's degree, two at purdue university for a master's degree, and four at state universities for a master's or doctoral degree.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 34
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29.1%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: 53.7%; rating input score 54
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.9%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.55; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.4%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 48.6% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 47.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 29.1% of revenue deployed · 53.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $174K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $47K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.