Thrive Scholars
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455619310
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6175004449
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,967,734
- Expenses
- $18,829,859
- Assets
- $6,093,967
- Liabilities
- $1,932,632
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEVE STEIN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNTIL 08/24)
- TYRA MONTINA (PRESIDENT & COO UNTIL 12/24)
- DREW MARTIN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- STEVE STEIN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNTIL 08/24): $433,801 total reported compensation
- TYRA MONTINA (PRESIDENT & COO UNTIL 12/24): $397,828 total reported compensation
- AVA ARCHIBALD (CHF. EQU. & INCL. OFFI. UNTIL 12/24): $318,760 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We provide high-achieving students from under-resourced communities the opportunities they need to thrive at top colleges and in meaningful careers.
What it reported doing in 2024
Thrive scholars has achieved tremendous results in supporting scholars to enroll in top colleges, earn great grades, and graduate career-ready. Our results within the last two years show that 89% of thrive scholars are attending a top college, 39% are going to an ivy league+ school (defined as the ivy league plus stanford, mit, the university of chicago, and duke), and 99% graduated from college within six years. Our scholars have an average gpa of 3.5 upon college graduation; 87% of stem scholars persisted and graduated with a stem degree, and our first-year college scholars finished their freshman year with an average gpa of 3.4. Our scholars are outperforming the general population at top colleges, not just similar high-achieving, economically disadvantaged, first generation students of color. Thrive scholars are 10% more likely to graduate from college than students at these highly ranked colleges, they are also 18% more likely to pursue a stem major and 55% more likely to persist in that stem major than students at highly ranked colleges. Of our recently graduated cohorts, 77% of scholars did so with a meaningful first-destination career placement and those in full-time salaried positions make 1.9x the income of their family background (over $73,000). We attribute this success largely to our signature summer academy, a robust 6-week academic program designed to demystify the college experience and expose first-generation students to the rigors of college, as well as our one-on-one college admissions counseling, coaching through the first year of college transition, and industry-specific career coaching in their final years of college. Since its inception, results have been overwhelming: our scholars' gpas increased from 2.9 to 3.45 stem persistence rose from 20% to 87%, and 6-year graduation rates increased from 90% to 99%.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 72% for direct work, and 28% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 15%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 78.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $434K · 33 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $644K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.