Thrive Networks Global
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330316095
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5107637045
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,490,852
- Expenses
- $1,345,209
- Assets
- $1,576,483
- Liabilities
- $148,321
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Thuy Ngo (Executive Dir.): $83,196 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Thrive Networks' expertise is built on over 30 years of experience of designing, testing, and implementing cutting-edge, evidence-based programs in water supply, sanitation and hygiene WASH, economic empowerment, gender equity, healthy cities and resilient community development to serve underserved populations in Southeast Asia, using innovating financing and service delivery models.
What it reported doing in 2024
Water, Sanitation & Hygiene - A community-based program integrating proven solutions to increase access to clean water and promote better sanitation and hygiene conditions for people in poor, rural areas of Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos. We work closely with local partners, use innovative financing and incentives, and support community education to stimulate demand for household connections to clean water, hygienic toilets, and the adoption of hygienic behaviors. Our Community-Led Inclusive, Climate Resilient WASH project integrates climate change adaptation knowledge with practical adaption actions at the household and community levels and promote inclusive resilient WASH in Cambodia's climate vulnerable areas. Aiming for transformative and scalable efforts with maximum impact, the approach focuses on reducing impacts and sustainability. The project adopts a mainstream approach to training and education on adaptation, and a targeted approach to implementing WASH adaptation actions that are socially inclusive and gender responsive. It builds on existing efforts of working with the government, private sector businesses, and disability groups develops new collaboration with experts to ensure the project produces data and information that are relevant and influential for the government and community in making decision about community resilience, especially for the most vulnerable. Thrive Networks WASH in Schools program installs water filtration systems and handwashing basins and latrines for kindergartens, primary schools, and secondary schools in rural and mountainous areas where daily living conditions of pupils and teachers are very difficult. The program also aims to raise awareness for school hygiene, and conducted a behavior change campaign promoting handwashing. The Climate Smart School pilot tackles the effects of climate change on education by providing climate adaptation upgrades to infrastructures, and promoting green skills and green lifestyles to students, teachers, and communities in rural areas. Applied research Nearly all of Thrive Networks programs feature a research component that moves beyond traditional process and output monitoring into the realm of impact evaluation. In Thrive Networks sanitation program, for example, there are dedicated resources to understand the relative advantages of individual vs. community-based output incentives, as well as exploring the interaction between smart subsidies and sanitation marketing. Community-scale water systems Thrive Networks has been constructing, rehabilitating, and expanding rural water supply and treatment systems since 1995. The majority are piped village water systems with metered household connections a smaller number are school-based water systems. Upon project completion, Thrive Networks transfers ownership and management responsibilities to government, private, or community operators.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.7%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 82.6%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $53.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Fail
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.8%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -18.6% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -31.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -31.4% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.7% of revenue deployed · 82.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $83K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 8 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.