Three Rivers Sportsmen Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 900440753
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Harwood, MD, USA
- Phone
- 2404263975
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreational l Clubs
- Affiliation
- Judaism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,895
- Expenses
- $67,568
- Assets
- $314,969
- Liabilities
- $10,462
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Tom Glowacki (President)
- Michael Maher (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Tom Glowacki (President)
- Michael Maher (Vice President)
- Joseph Kenner (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A. Conserve, manage, and restore wildlife and its habitat in this area. B. To seek improved hunting and fishing opportunities for sportsmen. C. To promote and maintain friendly relations between landowners and sportsmen. D. To cooperate with law enforcement officials in the enforcement of wildlife and firearms laws. E. To promote the safe handling and use of firearms. F. To help educate people as to the benefits of proper wildlife management. G. To provide the habitat and facilities for training rabbit and bird hunting dogs. H. To provide a place where members may shoot their personal firearms.
What it reported doing in 2025
Provide and maintain trapp shooting facilitiesMaintain habitat and facilities for hunting dog trainingMaintain pistol firing rangeTeach hunting and safety courses for adults and youth
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 1
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 1%; rating input score 1
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.66; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 1% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.