Three Rivers Business Alliance Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841834451
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Phone
4127151849
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Economic Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$110,037
Expenses
$49,900
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$5,313

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Bradley Wilkind (President)
  • Jordan Botta (Current Executive Director (ED))

People named in this filing

  • Bradley Wilkind (President)
  • Lee Ann Munger (Secretary)
  • Jules Hughes (Sr VP)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To educate, inspire, & empower members of the LGBTQIA+ business community & their Allies in the Pittsburgh/Greater Allegheny region & build a stronger overall economy & community by providing professional & business development education & programming

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide professional & business development education and programmingto the LGBTQIA+ business professionals, entrepreneurs & small business owners & their Allies in the Pittsburgh/Greater Allegheny area.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 92% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 14
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 45
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 9.5%; rating input score 9
  • Program expense ratio: 20.9%; rating input score 21

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 54.7%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 208.2%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 33.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -80.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 9.5% of revenue deployed · 20.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 9/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.