Three Chopt Recreation Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 540644336
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Henrico, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8042736602
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $508,173
- Expenses
- $468,759
- Assets
- $471,814
- Liabilities
- $424,090
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DONNA BOYKIN (SECRETARYTREASURER): $21,512 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Swim and racket club that provides pools, tennis, volleyball and basket ball courts, a picnic area for lessons and recreational and competitive activities for 500 plus families.
What it reported doing in 2025
Aquatics- provide pools, swimming lessons, competitive swim meets, diving lessons and competitive dive meets.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.9%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 70.2%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.8%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.9; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.9% of revenue deployed · 70.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $329K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $22K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.