Thompson Center on Lourdes Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813840811
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Appleton, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9209393088
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,694,914
- Expenses
- $1,038,699
- Assets
- $7,125,551
- Liabilities
- $1,874,512
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- COLNY GRETZINGER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DAWN GOHLKE (EXECUTIVE DI): $95,387 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The thompson center on lourdes, inc. D/b/a mary beth nienhaus activity center, inc. Vision is to provide opportunities for people 50+ to thrive through meaningful collaboration, socialization, education and wellness programming.
What it reported doing in 2025
Driving the vision and mission are four foundational pillars that guide everything we do at the mary beth nienhaus activity center: collaboration working together with community partners to leverage a wide range of knowledge, resources, and expertise. We are proud to collaborate with nearly 140 partners throughout the community, expanding both our reach and impact. Socialization building connections and a strong sense of community through social activities, events, and group outings. Research shows that social isolation can be as harmful to ones health as smoking 15 cigarettes a day. The good news is that social isolation is a modifiable risk factor meaning it can be changed. Strong social connections have been shown to positively influence outcomes related to stroke, coronary artery disease, cancer, and obesity. Education providing learning experiences that are timely, inclusive, and relevant. Educational programming helps keep the mind active, supporting memory, attention, and problem-solving skills. Continued learning promotes cognitive resilience and may help delay age-related cognitive decline. Wellness programming supporting healthy minds and bodies. As an activity center, we intentionally incorporate movement and wellness education into our offerings. Our programs build strength, support daily functioning, help prevent falls, and promote healthy habits such as nutrition and chronic disease managementenhancing independence and overall well-being. These pillars are reflected in everything we dofrom our programming to our partnerships to the way we engage with our community. In 2025, the mary beth nienhaus activity center relocated to 3000 e. College avenue, suite b, in appleton, Wisconsin. Upon opening its doors in june, the center experienced tremendous growthserving 3,730 individuals, up from 2,411 the previous year, representing a 55% increase. The center also recorded 42,228 participant visits and delivered more than 3,563 programs designed to enrich the lives of older adults.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.9%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 73.4%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 38.7%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.86; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 22.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 28.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 41.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.9% of revenue deployed · 73.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $762K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $95K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 35/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 40/100.