Thomas House Temporary Shelter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
330204757
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Garden Grove, CA, USA
Phone
7145540357
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,792,134
Expenses
$1,857,080
Assets
$4,374,450
Liabilities
$2,827,867

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANA MARIE DEL RIO (PRESIDENT)
  • JUAN CARLOS VELEZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SHAKOYA GREEN LONG (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • SHAKOYA GREEN LONG (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $185,278 total reported compensation
  • REBEKAH ONE (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $115,594 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide at-risk and unhoused families-with-children a safe and supportive environment where they are empowered to achieve independence and self-sufficiency.

What it reported doing in 2024

Thomas house temporary shelter (the organization") was founded in 1986 as a California nonprofit corporation under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. The organization's mission is to provide safe, temporary housing, essential resources, and life-changing support to families-with-children at risk of or experiencing homelessness in orange county, California.at thomas house, we believe that every family in america deserves a secure, supportive home where they can grow, thrive, and build a brighter future. Our vision drives us to serve the most vulnerable in our community, helping families transform their lives and break the cycle of poverty and homelessness.thomas house operates two cornerstone programs designed to break the cycle of homelessness: shelter and supportive services and homeless prevention services. Families in the shelter and supportive services program are housed in apartments owned by thomas house and receive a comprehensive range of services, including individualized case management, housing navigation, career development, counseling, financial literacy, and budgeting assistance. We provide the tools and resources necessary for families to regain stability and secure permanent housing.through the homeless prevention services program, graduate thomas house families receive critical interventions such as case management, career development, financial counseling and housing navigation. These services are designed to prevent homelessness before it starts, keeping families together and in stable housing environments.the majority of the organization's funding comes from the generous support of donors, foundations, and government grants. These contributions allow us to continue expanding our services and ensure that no family has to face homelessness alone.for over 38 years, thomas house family shelter has a remarkable success rate of 100% in helping graduating families secure permanent housing. Thomas house family shelter consistently demonstrates its impactful presence. 91% of school aged children increased their academic standings and 100% of graduate families tracked retain housing for 12 months or longer. Collaborating with over 100 local community partners and supported by a dedicated team of over 400 volunteers annually, we continue to strengthen our mission and make a lasting difference in the lives of those we serve.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.8%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 78.8%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.6%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.36; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.65; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.2%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.8% of revenue deployed · 78.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $185K · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.