Thief River Falls Area Community Theater
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411263273
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Thief River Falls, MN, USA
- Phone
- 2186813810
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $154,824
- Expenses
- $152,466
- Assets
- $202,521
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MEGAN MALONEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- GABBY YOON (PRESIDENT)
- DENA HALSA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JANE ANDERSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- MEGAN MALONEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- CYNDI ONKKA (TREASURER)
- BEK LAMONT (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is two-fold: to provide local performers with outlets for creative expression; and to provide quality entertainment for audiences.we produced five shows in 2025. Our shows were little shop of horrors, talking with.., seussical kids, the addams family musical and an evening of short comedies. We continued the radio readers' theater in conjunction with pioneer 90.1 radio, a monthly drama that airs on 90.1 fm twice each month.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization provides theater productions to the community. Five productions were given in 2025.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.2%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 74.2%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.5%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 43.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.2% of revenue deployed · 74.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $113K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.