Theres Hope

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
883724200
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Centre, AL, USA
Rating
49
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$34,500
Expenses
$35,530
Assets
$12,509

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kelsy Plummer (President)
  • Brooke Ledbetter (Vice President and Secretary)

People named in this filing

  • Kelsy Plummer (President)
  • Brooke Ledbetter (Vice President and Secretary)
  • Nikki Bishop (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Theres Hope is a free and confidential service for mothers and fathers experiencing an unplanned pregnancy. We come alongside new parents by offering counselling mentorship program parenting courses free pregnancy tests maternity items baby items and other much needed items that are required to care for infants to two year olds.

What it reported doing in 2025

Free Pregnancy testing. We offer free and confidential pregnancy testing. We buy medical grade pregnancy test strips and administer the tests to clients. After reviewing if the test is positive or negative we refer to an OBGYN or counsel them about their choices. We discuss abortion adoption and parenting and provide education for all through to help equip the parents for their best choice.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 5
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 4.9%; rating input score 5
  • Program expense ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 5

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 41.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 4.9% of revenue deployed · 4.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.