Theatre at the Colony Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463866006
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2013
Location
The Colony, TX, USA
Phone
9032353744
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,037
Expenses
$43,422
Assets
$39,075
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CORIE CLIFTON (PRESIDENT)
  • WYNDI GEREN (VICE PRESIDENT - SPONSORSH)
  • JESSICA LASHUA (VICE PRESIDENT - HOSPITALI)
  • ROBERT ELIAS (VICE PRESIDENT - CONCESSIO)
  • LUCY ELIAS (VICE PRESIDENT - CONCESSIO)
  • ARYKA NASIATKA (VICE PRESIDENT - CONCESSIO)

People named in this filing

  • CORIE CLIFTON (PRESIDENT)
  • ANGI CHARLES (TREASURER)
  • JEANINE BOURBON (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the theatre at the colony booster club is to create opportunities for our students to participate in enriching, educational, and inspirational theatrical experiences. The organization will accomplish this mission by providing resources and support to create hands-on experiences in the production of quality presentations for our school and community, join with other schools and local theaters for mutual assistance and enrichment, create opportunities for students to develop talents, self-confidence, and self-esteem through cooperation, collaboration, and respect for the craft and each other, and develop the spirit of volunteerism.

What it reported doing in 2024

To promote the advancement of the drama department of the colony high school by providing support for the student actors and crew and creating opportunities for the students to participate in enriching, educational, and inspirational theatrical experiences.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.4%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.9%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -19.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 29.8% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.