The Ywcas of the Southeast Region Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
331037890
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Asheville, NC, USA
Phone
8285052335
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Young Men's or Women's Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$13,400
Expenses
$150,335
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

41 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ywcas southeast region is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. The responsibilities of the se region are building local and regional capacity for service delivery by local associations; providing technical assistance and training to local associations; providing technical assistance to local associations within the region at risk of losing membership, aiding in the growth and strength of the ywca movement by developing new associations for membership in the ywca of the USA; and making recommendations regarding local association membership. The organization's activities consist of providing support to member ywcas, all of which are 501(c)(3) charitable organizations.

What it reported doing in 2012

Peer review: involves scheduling, training, providing staff/volunteers, conducting, and following up the peer reviews of local associations. Peer review assessment takes place no less than once every five years in each local association to assure compliance with affiliation standards. Each local association opens its operations to a peer review that is conducted by a peer review team made up of volunteers from the region. Following peer review, a corrective action plan is developed by the local association and submitted to the regional office. It is then monitored for compliance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 3
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,021.9%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 49.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -70.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -70.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 40 of 40 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $85K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $75K · 41 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.