The Ywca Princeton Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 210635056
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Princeton, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 6094972100
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Young Men's or Women's Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,402,019
- Expenses
- $4,892,345
- Assets
- $14,982,142
- Liabilities
- $341,313
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NIKKI JONES (PRESIDENT)
- LAILA WILSON MCCOY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ROSANDA WONG (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- ROSANDA WONG (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $194,897 total reported compensation
- TARA O'SHEA (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $139,023 total reported compensation
- KAREN FAIMAN (CHIEF ADVANCEMENT OFFICER): $96,360 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our early childhood education program provides a comprehensive, developmentally appropriate learning environment that supports the whole child socially, emotionally, cognitively, and physically. Through age-appropriate, evidence-based curriculum and structured yet exploratory classroom experiences, children build foundational skills in language and literacy, early mathematics, problem solving, self-regulation and social-emotional development. Our programs are intentionally designed to nurture creativity, curiosity, cultural awareness, and a lifelong love of learning while recognizing and supporting each child's individual strengths and learning styles. Aligned with our mission, we operate inclusive, equitable, and culturally responsive programs that emphasize respect, empathy and positive identity development while maintaining strong family partnerships and open communication. Our qualified staff engage in ongoing professional development and adhere to all applicable regulatory and quality standards to ensure a safe, high-quality early learning environment for every child and family we serve.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.6%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 66.5%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.1%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.06; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.8%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.6% of revenue deployed · 66.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $195K · 19 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $183K reported
- Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.