The Young Women's Project
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521898999
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2023323399
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $921,243
- Expenses
- $521,350
- Assets
- $1,453,318
- Liabilities
- $49,422
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- NADIA GOLD-MORITZ (EXECUTIVE DI): $126,298 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ywp builds the leadership and power of young people so that they can transform dc institutions to expand rights and opportunities for dc youth. Ywp programs engage youth on three levels - as peer educators, advocates, and employees - and guide them through a process of personal growth as community leaders who are able to analyze problems, identify solutions, and advocate for change. Founded in 1994, ywp has a staff of 6 and manages two offices. Ywp is value-driven, anti-racist, feminist, grounded in youth development and partnership, and works every day to dismantle oppression and rebuild institutions.
What it reported doing in 2023
P2p-sbmh (peer to peer school based mental health program, dbh funded). This program overlaps significantly with the mental health campaign (mhc). With the overall goals of reducing stigma and the impact of toxic stress and trauma, increasing school-based mental health services, and expanding school-based mental-wellness education, the school-based behavioral health student peer educator pilot program (sb-bh p2p) trained and supported a cadre of more than 122 youth staff leaders (ages 14-19) from 30+ dc public schools who will use education, referrals, social media, and student on- line support (sos) virtual wellness centers to educate to engage 12,032 peers and connect them to mental health services. P2p-sbmh youth staff reached 12,032 peers with mental health education and support including 11,013 through classroom presentations and 2,120 with weekly resources and skills-focused information. Youth connected 2,879 directly to counselors and mental health providers. More than 65% of youth staff and youth reached will live in high poverty neighborhoods and wards 5, 7 and 8. With the overall goals of reducing stigma and the impact of toxic stress and trauma, increasing school-based mental health services, and expanding school-based mental-wellness education, the mental health campaign trained and supported a cadre of more than 122 youth staff leaders (ages 14-19) from 30+ dc public schools who used education, referrals, social media, and student on-line support (sos) virtual wellness centers to educate to engage 12,032 students (including 2,200 each week with personalized messages) through training, text chats, social media, and presentations, covering 10 health issues including toxic stress, resilience building, sleep, trauma, anxiety, healthy relationship building, consent, conflict resolution, meditation, mindfulness, breathing, brain science,, depression, substance use, suicide, nutrition, and accessing school based and city-wide mental health services. We also connected more than 2,400 youth to counselors and other supports, presented 42 testimonies to dc council and submitted 82 written testimonies, and conducted a survey with 1,040 students from 36 schools including 16 dcps and 14 public charter schools, 3 private, and 3 middle schools living in all dc wards with significant representation from wards 7 and 8 (30% of survey takers), 4 (24%) and 5 (15%). Since 2020, ywp peer educators have conducted an annual youth mental health & wellness survey--documenting high rates of youth stress, depression, and isolation and low rates of service access. We used the survey findings and our experience to educate teachers, counselors, principals, and agency leaders on the needs of youth - who are still in crisis with high rates of depression (31%), suicide (14%) and high stress (77%). Finally, mhc deepened the role of our l2 (advanced) youth leaders this year: 12 l2 mhc youth leaders served as trainers for new staff, implementing a 8 hour curricula including substance use, nutrition, food deserts, and nutrition. Engaging l2 youth allows us to maintain larger teams and be able to deliver the curricula in smaller groups.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 64% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 73
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.7%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 95.7%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: $78.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 43.4%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.79; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.2%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.7% of revenue deployed · 95.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $499K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $126K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.