The Young Men's Christian Association of North Central Ohio Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
340714795
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Mansfield, OH, USA
Phone
4195223511
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Young Men's or Women's Associations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,130,710
Expenses
$8,328,649
Assets
$16,076,081
Liabilities
$716,215

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • CRISTEN GILBERT (CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $164,459 total reported compensation
  • JULIANNA AKUCHIE (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $94,037 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to build a community where all people, especially youth, are encouraged to develop their fullest potential in mind, body, and spirit. Our purpose is to strengthen the community through nurturing children of all ages, improving the collective health and

What it reported doing in 2025

Healthy living and social responsibility - the y is committed to fostering healthy living styles for individuals and families from all backgrounds, age groups, and cultures in our community. Our goal is to strengthen not only the body, but also the spirit and the mind. We create a space for people to connect with other people while also improving their health and wellbeing. As a result, over 12,000 members and participants are receiving support, guidance, and resources to meet these goals. The y offers group exercise classes, individual personal training, and adult and child team sports. We also offer comprehensive swim programs for individuals from 6 months of age to senior citizens to individuals with special needs. Through our livestrong program, we helped 47 cancer survivors gain physical strength and endurance in a safe, encouraging space free of cost. We partnered with our county foster program to provide $95,361 of discounted memberships to those who foster children in the community and to a local organization that helps individuals with disabilities that are learning to live independently. In alignment with our mission that the y be for all, we were able to provide 333 families a total of $166,705 in scholarships to lower income individuals and families in the community to ensure that all have access to the y's services, regardless of their background or ability to pay. As part of an outreach program, we partnered with a local organization to provide 350 free meals to members of the community experiencing homelessness and poverty.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 78% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.6%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.4%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.93; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.6% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $164K · 16 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.