YMCA of Greater Birmingham

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
630299894
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Birmingham, AL, USA
Phone
2054452873
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Young Men's or Women's Associations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,468,105
Expenses
$31,736,407
Assets
$62,696,316
Liabilities
$19,609,535

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

44 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHAD ZAUCHA (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • DANIEL HOWARD PILE (PRESIDENT/CEO)
  • SUSAN BECKER (GROUP VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JUDE DOOLEY (CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER): $257,695 total reported compensation
  • CHAD ZAUCHA (PRESIDENT/CEO): $240,323 total reported compensation
  • KRISTINE WILLIAMS (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $232,366 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The YMCA of Greater Birmingham is a charitable organization dedicated to making our community a healthier place to live. Since opening our doors in 1884 here in Birmingham, our focus has remained the same: to connect people of all ages and backgrounds to bridge the gap in community needs. Over the years, our programs and facilities have changed, but not our mission of service to the community. Today, the YMCA of Greater Birmingham serves the metro Birmingham area through its 8 Membership Branches, 2 Youth Centers, and Camp Cosby Sleepaway Camp. Our **Youth Development** programming supports families and youth through a variety of character-building programs including Afterschool Academy, Sum.

What it reported doing in 2025

Youth development: the ymca believes that all children deserve the opportunity to discover who they are and what they can achieve. Because of their interaction through the ymca, millions of youth today are taking a greater interest in learning, making smart life choices, and cultivating the values, skills, and relationships that lead to positive behaviors, for example the pursuit of higher education and goal achievement.after school academy is designed to help youth in every community succeed developmentally and academically. The y's curriculum framework, created in partnership with national experts in youth development, offers comprehensive, age-appropriate, and engaging programming. Research has shown that youth who participate in after school programs are more successful academically, maintain better health, and more often exhibit positive behavior. Our innovative after school program is centered on nine research-based components: academic enrichment, health and wellness, global learning, and parent and family engagement.the kindergarten readiness program serves 4-year-old children. This program utilizes a curriculum that teaches english language proficiency, school readiness behaviors, and vocabulary through activities, games, and songs. The academic curriculum is supplemented utilizing age appropriate crafts and guest readers. First class pre-k at the ymca serves 4-year-old children. The class uses the creative curriculum for preschool. This comprehensive, research-based curriculum features exploration and discovery as a way of learning; enabling children to develop confidence, creativity, and lifelong critical thinking skills. It is designed to help educators at all levels of experience plan and implement a developmentally appropriate, content-rich program for children with diverse backgrounds and skill levels.in summer day camp, campers enjoy a variety of fun-filled activities including recreational games, crafts, and swimming. Campers register in their favorite themed camps and complete activities based on that specific camp. To deliver on our commitment to nurture the potential of every child, the y is intentional in fostering achievement, relationships, and belonging through our summer day camp program. Our focus is the infusion of evidence-based activities proven to build dimensions of well-being, including skill building activities to help children realize their accomplishments, passions, talents, and potential, building friendships to demonstrate the role positive relationships play in the well-being of a child, having a place to belong where kids feel safe, welcome, and free to express their individuality, and incorporating social-emotional, cognitive, and physical development activities into summer day camp. The y is equipping children to realize their potential in school and life. With the right building blocks for healthy development, children gain the skills they need to be active, thrive, and contribute as valuable members of society.the ymca youth and teen leadership development prepares our youth for life beyond high school. It is comprised of two components: y achievers and civic leadership training/youth and government. Y achievers brings middle and high school students together to participate in character development activities, visit colleges and universities, and meet in small groups to explore career options. Civic leadership training/youth and government is a national program of the ymca. It involves thousands of teens nationwide in state-organized model-government programs. In youth and government, teens from across the state meet in their local clubs throughout the year to discuss and debate issues that affect citizens of their state and to propose possible legislation to make state government more efficient. The program culminates with the teens serving as delegates at their state conference, debating bills on the floor of the legislature. As a result of the program, young people learn about the

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.9%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 87.9%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.98; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 75.9% of revenue deployed · 87.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 39 of 39 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $27.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $258K · 44 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.5M reported
  • Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.