The York Theatre
Legal name: The York Theatre Company Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133550290
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- (862) 235-0938
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,249,377
- Expenses
- $2,144,892
- Assets
- $2,865,882
- Liabilities
- $224,394
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JIM KIERSTEAD (President)
- RIKI KANE LARIMER (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- JAMES MORGAN (PRODUCING ARTISTIC DIRECTOR): $77,785 total reported compensation
- JOSEPH HAYWARD (PROD ARTIS DIRE): $60,263 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The York Theatre is dedicated to celebrating the past, present, and future of the American musical, nurturing playwrights, composers, lyricists, directors, and players.
What it reported doing in 2024
To be a birthplace for new, literate, intimate musicals, and a place where underappreciated musical gems from the past are rediscovered.since 1969, the yorks significant impact has outpaced our budget and staff size: producing 75+ mainstage productions, 100+ musicals in mufti, and 45+ cast recordings. Developmental readings have nurtured the creation of nearly 700 new musicals. We received a special drama desk award for vital contributions to theater by developing and producing new musicals, and an outer critics circle special achievement award for 50 years of producing new and classic musicals.principal programs: mainstage (full-scale productions, most are world, american, or ny premieres); new2ny (limited-run ny premieres), musicals in mufti (limited-run revivals of neglected/lesser-known works); and developmental readings of works in progress (which also serves as one pipeline to productions). Through these activities, we expose audiences to varied forms of musical theater at all stages of development, support musical theaters future, and foster appreciation of its past. In curating each season, the artistic team looks for fresh approaches, stories, and characters, and considers audience and community feedback.our 2024/2025 season provided space for new stories to take center stage. Welcome to the big dipper (music and lyrics by jimmy roberts and book by catherine filloux and john daggett) made its world premiere in december 2025. The show received critical acclaim, leading to a cast recording featuring the york's company. It has since enjoyed continued life beyond New York, including a regional production in des moines, Iowa. We premiered two new2nys musicals according to howard (world-premiere) and who is jimmy pants? (world-premiere), as well as our beloved musicals in mufti programming with a revival of platinum dreams. The york's developmental readings and workshops allow creators to receive valuable feedback on new works. This program has been the incubator for such shows as avenue q; summer of 42; harold and maude; yank!; in transit; souvenir; the musical of musicals (the musical!); mark felt; superstar; we foxes; marry harry; and desperate measures. Our 24/25 season saw the development of 8 new works. In 2025, we launched a re-brand and a new website, which honors our legacy while modernizing our look to engage new audiences; and launched the micki grant artist-in-residence program (honoring the trailblazing artist and york honorary board member emerita) to support early-career theatermakers from underrepresented communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 62
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.6%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 84%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $21.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.4%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 56.6% of revenue deployed · 84% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $78K · 20 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.