The World Health Clinicians Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272210659
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Norwalk, CT, USA
Phone
2038529525
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,038,373
Expenses
$18,522,226
Assets
$10,159,541
Liabilities
$2,390,469

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DR PAOLA GREIGER-ZALUNGO (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANDREW MITCHELL-NAMDAR (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANTHONY H CRISCI (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID RUBIN (SENIOR MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $374,094 total reported compensation
  • KENNETH ABRIOLA (MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $311,695 total reported compensation
  • ANTHONY H CRISCI (PRESIDENT & CEO): $290,870 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted diseases, and to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality in the developed and developing worlds through treatment, education, patient advocacy and assistance.

What it reported doing in 2024

Medical services: the organization, through its circle center care clinics, provides high-quality, sensitive and comprehensive primary care targeted to meet the health needs of all patients. Their providers specialize in working with people living with HIV and members of the lgbtq community. The care includes a relationship with a primary medical provider accompanied by a team of clinical support staff, annual wellness visits including preventative screenings, general medical services for common aliments (flu, fevers, sexually transmitted infections, etc.), management of chronic health conditions such as a HIV/AIDS, diabetes, asthma, high blood pressure, depression, among others, bilingual staff fluent in both english and spanish, and on-site blood draws.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.8%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 90.8%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Pass
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Limited
    • Conducts site visits: Limited
    • Requires grant agreements: Limited
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99%; rating input score 99; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.7%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.7%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.8% of revenue deployed · 90.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $16.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $374K · 13 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.