THE WOMENS FORUM INC FKA Tech Alpharetta Womens Forum Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934375571
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Alpharetta, GA, USA
Phone
6784572657
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,282
Expenses
$10,871
Assets
$18,976

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID FISHER (Vice President)
  • SUNITA AURORA (President)

People named in this filing

  • LAURA O'TUEL (Treasurer)
  • DAVID FISHER (Vice President)
  • SUNITA AURORA (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Tech Alpharetta Women's Forum, Inc. is dedicated to helping and encouraging young women to enter into STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, the digital Arts and Math).

What it reported doing in 2025

The Women's Forum hosted its fifth full year mentorship program, with 17 pairs of high school STEAM girls and women technology leaders in the Alpharetta area, for the 2025 school year. The scaled back pairings allowed for the program to be more structured with a new curriculum to be introduced to all the high school STEAM girls led by female leaders of the high-tech community in Alpharetta, GA. The pairs meet once a month on the high school campus, providing real world feedback on communication, career planning, academic challenges, and time management. The Women's Forum split away from Tech Alpharetta in early 2025 to establish its own entity led by a board to carry on the mission and vision that started under Tech Alpharetta's Women's Forum. In 2025, the Women's Forum had four community sponsors to help further the mission of advancing young women in technology.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 3
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.9%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 2

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.1%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.75; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -195.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -153.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.9% of revenue deployed · 2.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $265 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.