The Wilson House of East Dorset
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 030317469
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- East Dorset, VT, USA
- Phone
- 8023625524
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $904,818
- Expenses
- $651,532
- Assets
- $2,360,150
- Liabilities
- $50,502
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY NORMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KIMBERLY NORMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $112,690 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mission: The Wilson House is the birthplace and childhood home of Bill W., co-founder of Alcoholics Anonymous and author of the Twelve Steps. We connect people in recovery through rich and inspirational programs and a thriving fellowship in a beautiful historic setting in southern Vermont. Organization Overview: The Wilson House of East Dorset operates a historic hotel and nonprofit retreat center located in the birthplace of Bill Wilson, co-founder of Alcoholics Anonymous. The organization provides a welcoming and inclusive refuge for individuals and groups in recovery from alcoholism and addiction, as well as others seeking spiritual growth and community connection. Through retreats, seminars, educational programs, and 12-Stepbased gatherings, The Wilson House fosters understanding, fellowship, and personal renewal. In addition to preserving this nationally significant historic site, the organization offers year-round lodging, meeting spaces, and hospitality for people of all backgro
What it reported doing in 2024
The Wilson House of East Dorset operates a historic hotel and nonprofit retreat center located in the birthplace of Bill Wilson, co-founder of Alcoholics Anonymous. The organization provides a welcoming and inclusive refuge for individuals and groups in recovery from alcoholism and addiction, as well as others seeking spiritual growth and community connection. Through retreats, seminars, educational programs, and 12-Stepbased gatherings, The Wilson House fosters understanding, fellowship, and personal renewal. In addition to preserving this nationally significant historic site, the organization offers year-round lodging, meeting spaces, and hospitality for people of all backgrounds, helping them find serenity and support in an environment dedicated to recovery and service.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.6%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 28%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.62; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.3%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.6% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $475K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $113K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 30/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.