The Williamsport Home

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
240795507
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Williamsport, PA, USA
Phone
5703238781
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,908,245
Expenses
$19,958,439
Assets
$18,058,498
Liabilities
$4,155,108

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CANDACE DEWAR (PRESIDENT)
  • SUSAN EVANS (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER CISNEROS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • SUSAN R HOOKER (REGISTERED NURSE): $139,758 total reported compensation
  • HOLLY JAMISON (REGISTERED NURSE): $118,578 total reported compensation
  • TERESA BROCK (DIRECTOR OF NURSING): $118,347 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide the highest quality of care to our residents while honoring their independence and dignity.

What it reported doing in 2024

The williamsport home (the home) operates a 129-bed skilled nursing and rehabilitation center, 2 licensed personal care programs and 185 independent living apartments which serve men and women. The home also operates a continuing care retirement community (ccrc) providing housing, health care, and other related services to elderly residents. The home was approved to provide congregate meals, transportation and assistance to apartment residents by the department of health as a home care provider on april 1, 2011.our programs are designed to help maintain our resident's health, security and independence.continued on schedule othe home provides care to patients who meet certain criteria without charge or at amounts less than its established rates. Because the home does not pursue collections of amounts determined to qualify as charity care, such amounts are not reported as revenues. The home provided approximately $28,000 of charity care during 2024. Additionally, the home provides services to medical assistance beneficiaries and is reimbursed at rates different from standard room charges. The total differences related to these services were approximately $1,717,000 in 2024.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.5%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 89.4%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.3%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.5% of revenue deployed · 89.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $17.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $140K · 19 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.9M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.