The Wichita Children's Home

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
480547706
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Wichita, KS, USA
Phone
3166846581
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Residential Care & Adult Day Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,235,991
Expenses
$12,010,022
Assets
$26,308,889
Liabilities
$596,802

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

33 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHEN CLARK II (PRESIDENT)
  • JEFF JAMISON (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • JULIE GENTILE (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • DEBORAH KENNEDY (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • DEBORAH KENNEDY (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $198,661 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To assure the safety and well-being of children and to create heathly families by providing: assessment and intervention services; a temporary home for children at risk of abuse, neglect, or homelessness; education, prevention and advocacy initiatives.

What it reported doing in 2024

Every child safe, every family supportedat the wichita children's home, our primary commitment is to create a safe place for children and youth in crisis. Our programs and services include personalized therapeutic interventions, thorough case management, and holistic care crafted to address the unique needs of each child. These services ensure that every child receives personalized support and specialized attention using a shared decision-making model. Our goal is to instill in them the courage and confidence needed to build a brighter future, inspired by the hope and support they found at wichita children's home. (continue on schedule o)wch approachrecognizing the profound effects trauma has on a child's emotional well-being, behavior, and ability to form healthy relationships, our approach is rooted in the rich relationship model of care. The rich model emphasizes respect, information, connection, and hope, guiding our staff to build relationships grounded in empathy, trust, and compassion. These rich relationships are essential for children and youth who have experienced past betrayal and trauma as they provide a safe space for healing and growth. We are committed to creating an environment where every child feels understood and supported, paving the way for healing relationships, personal growth, and a hopeful, brighter future.child placing agency: children and youth are cared for by wch foster parents who have completed extensive training in how to meet the needs of abused and neglected children. Most children come to us in police protective custody. Some find permanent homes through our foster-to-adopt program.emergency residential shelter: older children (ages 13-17) that have experienced trauma are cared for and offered intensive support on the wch main campus in a home-like setting with individual bedrooms.crossroads youth homeless program: emergency shelter - a 30-day shelter bed program that provides runaway, homeless and at-risk youth who are 18-24 with a safe place to sleep.street outreach services/drop-in shelter - through mobile outreach and the opportunity zone drop-in center, homeless youth receive the physical, emotional and logistical support they need to stabilize their lives and access services that help them reduce their risks, get off the street and build a brighter future. Street outreach also operates our community's 24-hour safe place program for runaways and youth who are in crisis or danger. Crossroads teens - runaway youth and their families receive the intensive support they need to develop and maintain healthy relationships with each other. Workshops in area schools help teens identify dangerous situations, reduce their risk of harm, and provide education on how to get help if they need it. Polaris - youth residential center: a residential program for youth (ages 16-18) in state's custody who need support as they learn to improve their decision making, coping skills, and to address any underlying problems which are affecting their successful transition with their families or communities. Bridges apartments: formerly homeless youth who are transitioning to self-sufficiency live in one-bedroom apartments. Parenting youth have access to licensed, on-site daycare while they work and attend school.gerard house, moving onto motherhood, baby mobile: gerard house serves pregnant and parenting teens who are in state's custody and need intensive residential support to ensure they and their babies get a healthy start. Mom provides education and targeted case management to pregnant teens in the community who lack adequate family support. Baby mobile delivers necessities like diapers, formula and hygiene supplies to teen parents as well as counseling.anti-trafficking initiative: wch is a leader in the fight against human trafficking of children, operating Kansas' first and only staff secure unit for victims of human trafficking, as well as a residential program that supports survivors and their families as th

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 59
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 93.1%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.19; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.7%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93% of revenue deployed · 93.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 32 of 32 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $199K · 33 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.