The White Rose Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
870792624
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Denver, CO, USA
Rating
61
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Reported finances

Revenue
$47,915
Expenses
$51,276
Assets
$235,546

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Nina Henderson Moore (President)

People named in this filing

  • Nina Henderson Moore (President)
  • Toni Baruti (Treasurer)
  • Sandra Roberts Taylor (Financial Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The White Rose Foundation Incorporated was founded in Denver Colorado on January 17 2007 by members of the Denver CO Chapter of The Links Incorporated an organization of professional women of color that addresses disparities in the Black community. The foundation is a private 501c3 entity formed for charitable and educational purposes. The purpose of The White Rose Foundation is to promote encourage assist and engage in any and all kinds of charitable work to improve the educational social and economic welfare of people of color and other disadvantaged persons. To that end The White Rose Foundation supports and provides funding to the Denver CO Chapters program facets including The Arts Health and Human Services International Trends and Services National Trends and Services and Services To Youth.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Denver CO Chap of The Links Inc - provided funding for the 5 facets: Arts Services to Youth Health and Wellness National Trends and International Trends

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.59; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.6% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -17.9% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 6 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.