The Wetlands Initiative
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363942451
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Chicago, IL, USA
- Phone
- 3129220777
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,465,450
- Expenses
- $2,723,493
- Assets
- $12,709,496
- Liabilities
- $553,054
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAUL BOTTS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- PAUL BOTTS (PRESIDENT): $182,587 total reported compensation
- GARY SULLIVAN (SENIOR RESTORATION ECOLOGIST): $110,113 total reported compensation
- JILL KOSTEL (SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER): $108,342 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To restore the wetland resources of the midwest to improve water quality, increase wildlife habitat and biodiversity, and reduce flood damage. The wetlands initiative seeks to conduct and support high-quality restoration projects though direct, on-the-ground work and by forming larger partnerships to demonstrate innovative ways to finance large-scale wetland restoration, such as water quality trading markets with a focus on science-based, economically sustainable projects and collaborative work with public agencies, the organization's goal is to develop restoration methods and models that others may copy.
What it reported doing in 2024
On-the-ground restoration - 2024 was a growth year for the wetlands initiative, during which the organization expanded its on-the-ground ecological restoration projects across Illinois and northwest Indiana. In particular, twi's collaborative work in the bi-state calumet region saw significant expansion with fresh project phases and new major funding at important remnant wetland sites in both southeast chicago and northwest Indiana. These efforts are returning important habitat for wildlife and rare marsh birds, boosting climate resilience, and improving nature access and quality of life for this urban region's underserved residents. Project highlights include: - twi continued phase iii habitat restoration at indian ridge marsh north in partnership with the chicago park district, building on highly successful shoreline modification in 2023 that created valuable transitional habitat.- at square marsh, owned by the Illinois international port district and part of historic lake calumet, twi and the nature conservancy of Illinois took the first steps in a multi-year restoration plan with treatment of invasive phragmites and buckthorn. - in nw Indiana, along the west branch of the little calumet river, twi and partners in the little calumet river conservation collaborative continued phase iii habitat restoration on three high-priority parcels totaling 436 acres, shifting focus to large native plant installations as seed and plugs with expanded volunteer participation. The collaborative also moved forward with planning for ecological restoration and improved public access on two major, high-potential tracts within the little calumet corridor: marshalltown marsh and the chase street complex. Both design processes focus on stream re-meandering-never previously accomplished in nw Indiana-and are being driven by resident and stakeholder input to ensure site plans are responsive to community desires and needs.at twi's 3,000-plus-acre sue and wes dixon waterfowl refuge in north-central Illinois, a designated ramsar wetland of international importance, twi staff enhanced public access in 2024 by developing new amenities and interpretive signage at the newly restored violet meadow parcel and refurbished the refuge's 30-foot observation tower. In advance of longtime senior ecologist dr. Gary sullivan's retirement, twi scientists created a comprehensive refuge management plan to provide strategic guidance for the site's coming years. Meanwhile, a new full-time site manager led the restoration crew in enhancing the refuge's dore seep nature preserve, managing invasive cattails and woody shrubs that were encroaching the highly diverse seep plant community. Finally, twi prepared 40 acres of former farmland for restoration to globally sand prairie on a new tract that twi acquired adjacent to the refuge's sandy hollow parcel in late 2023. With the completion of a massive seven-year restoration effort in 2023, in 2024 twi initiated a new, equally significant project at the forest service's midewin national tallgrass prairie in will county-the largest protected open space in the chicago metropolitan region. In collaboration with openlands, twi kicked off the first phase of the grant creek stream restoration, which will ultimately lead to the chicago wilderness region's first stream re-meandering effort. The grant creek parcel comprises 1,321 acres that will be transformed to healthy prairie, savanna, and floodplain wetland habitat, benefiting declining grassland bird species and expanding recreational opportunities adjacent to midewin's heavily visited bison pasture. Over 2024, twi's midewin field crew worked to remove small invasive trees and shrubs, while a contractor was selected to begin large-scale removal of aggressive/non-native trees.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.8%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 80%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $29.43 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 85.6%; rating input score 86; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.4%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.67; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.7%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.8% of revenue deployed · 80% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $183K · 23 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.