The West Virginia Municipal Water Quality Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311626634
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Richmond, VA, USA
- Phone
- 8047169021
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Boards of Trade
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $144,465
- Expenses
- $133,388
- Assets
- $101,760
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEREMIAH JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JEREMIAH JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
- STEVE COOPER (VICE-PRES)
- JARED CUMMONS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote municipal wastewater industry.
What it reported doing in 2025
The association participates in regulatory activities affecting the municipal wastewater treatment industry in West Virginia. It reviews and comments on the development of scientifically sound water quality standards in West Virginia. It tracked all national and state water quality standards, regulation requirements, and related litigation, including clean water permitting-related developments. Also, the association tracks and monitors state and federal legislation relating to the municipal wastewater treatment industry in West Virginia. The association conducted quarterly meetings. The attendees received analysis, updates and impacts of issues affecting the municipal wastewater treatment industry in West Virginia. Finally, the association distributed quarterly status reports and numerous interim briefing memos. These reports and memos provide anylysis, updates and impacts of issues affecting the municipal wastewater treatment industry in West Virginia.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.7%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.